Updated
September 28, 2020
| Dataset date: Aug 25, 2020-Sep 3, 2020
This dataset updates: Every six months
Tropical Cyclone Idai made landfall in central Mozambique the night of 14 March 2019. On 27 March 2019, IOM in
coordination with the Government of Mozambique carried out site assessments in 32 evacuation sites in the Beira district in
the Sofala province of Mozambique one of the provinces affected by the storm.
Updated
September 25, 2020
| Dataset date: Jun 1, 2020-Jul 5, 2020
This dataset updates: Every six months
A village assessment survey (VAS) is a sub-component of mobility tracking. It collects data on returning IDPs, IDPs, returned migrants and host community members. VAS evaluates the absorption capacity of villages to receive returning IDPs with a focus on accessibility of services, livelihoods and reintegration.
Updated
September 21, 2020
| Dataset date: Aug 1, 2020
This dataset updates: Every month
The Syrian IDP camps monitoring interactive study is issued by the IMU of the ACU on a monthly basis, to monitor the humanitarian situation of 231 IDp camps in Idleb and Aleppo governorates in Syria’s northwest, shedding light on the needs of the IDPs and the services provided in the camps in the following sectors:
Population statistics, WASH, Health, Education, FSL, Shelter and NFI, in addition to the priority needs of IDPs. The study also includes statistics of those who arrive at and leave the camps and the important incidents which took place during the month of the data collection.
Updated
September 11, 2020
| Dataset date: Feb 1, 2020-Mar 31, 2020
This dataset updates: Every year
The dataset has IDPs households and individuals with age and gender disaggregated data at sub national level. A site assessment is a sub-component of mobility tracking. It aims to collect data on population presence, living conditions and needs in a particular displacement site or community.
Updated
September 9, 2020
| Dataset date: Jan 7, 2020-Feb 23, 2020
This dataset updates: Every year
The dataset contains number of people displaced and returnees at village level in North Kivu province. The dataset also contains needs of the displaced and returned people, reason and time of displacement.
Updated
September 9, 2020
| Dataset date: Jan 31, 2020
This dataset updates: Every year
The dataset contains number of people displaced and returnees at village level in South Kivu province. The dataset also contains needs of the displaced and returned people, reason and time of displacement.
Updated
July 6, 2020
| Dataset date: Jan 1, 2020-Mar 31, 2020
This dataset updates: As needed
The data collection exercise conducted in the villages of Aru, Djugu, Irumu, Mahagi and Mambasa territories. It contains number of IDPs, returnees and theri needs.
Updated
March 25, 2020
| Dataset date: Feb 2, 2017-Mar 3, 2017
This dataset updates: As needed
Community level assessment data for 130 communities in Côte d'Ivoire, covering information about demographics, basic infrastructure, livelihoods, women's empowerment, child protection and education.
Updated
March 23, 2020
| Dataset date: Aug 5, 2019-Sep 15, 2019
This dataset updates: As needed
In successive waves over four decades, Rohingya refugees have been fleeing to Bangladesh from Rakhine State, Myanmar, where they have suffered systematic, ongoing persecution. Since August 2017, an estimated 745,000 Rohingya refugees have fled into Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, increasing the total number of Rohingya refugees to more than 900,000. Most of the newly-arrived refugees have settled in hilly, formerly-forested areas that are vulnerable to landslides and flash-flooding in monsoon season, and rely heavily on humanitarian assistance to cover their basic needs. As the crisis moves beyond the initial emergency phase, comprehensive information on the needs and vulnerabilities of affected populations is needed in order to inform the design and implementation of effective inter-sectoral programming.
To this aim, a comprehensive Joint Multi-Sector Needs Assessment (J-MSNA) was conducted among the host community to support humanitarian planning and enhance the ability of operational partners to meet the strategic aims of donors and coordinating bodies. The J-MSNA was conducted in support of the 2019 Rohingya Crisis MSNA Strategy, with the specific objectives of (1) Providing a comprehensive evidence base of household-level multi-sectoral needs for the 2020 Joint Response Plan; and (2) Providing the basis for a joint multi-stakeholder analysis process.
The full terms of reference for the assessment can be found here: https://www.humanitarianresponse.info/sites/www.humanitarianresponse.info/files/2019/07/Rohingya-Crisis-Bangladesh-Joint-MSNA----In-Depth-Assessment-Concept-Note-%28July-2019%29.pdf.
The J-MSNA was implemented and coordinated through the MSNA Technical Working Group of the Information Management and Assessment Working Group (IMAWG), led by the Inter-Sector Coordination Group and comprised of the following members: UNHCR, IOM Needs and Population Monitoring (NPM), ACAPS, WFP VAM, Translators without Borders, and REACH.
Updated
March 6, 2020
| Dataset date: Dec 12, 2016-Dec 31, 2020
This dataset updates: Every year
This data has been produced by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA) on behalf
of the Humanitarian Country Team and partners.
The data provides the Humanitarian Country Team’s shared understanding of the crisis, including the most pressing humanitarian need and the estimated number of people who need assistance. It represents a consolidated evidence base and helps inform joint strategic response planning.
The dataset contains number of people displaced and returnees at village level in Tanganyika province. The dataset also contains needs of the displaced and returned people, reason and time of displacement.
Updated
January 6, 2020
| Dataset date: Dec 25, 2019-Dec 27, 2019
This dataset updates: As needed
Findings presented in this data set are based on data collected by REACH as part of a rapid camps and sites assessment to provide insight on:
How many new IDP arrivals are arriving to camps, informal settlements, collective centres, or transit reception centres reported at the site level since Dec. 18th
Movement intentions of the new IDP arrivals in the coming two weeks
Identify priority needed items by sector of the new IDP arrivals. Data was collected in 150 communities across eight sub-districts in Northern Idleb and Western Aleppo from 25 to 27 December 2019 through REACH enumerators who surveyed one Key Informant (KI) per community on internally displaced persons' (IDPs) camps and sites nearest to their community.
In order to qualify as camp or site, a site had to have 5 or more IDP households living on its premises. 1,253 camps and sites were assessed across 150 communities. IDP numbers solely represent newly arrived IDPs (5 or more HH) to planned camps, informal settlements, collective centres, and transit reception centres, and do not account for total camp or site IDP populations or IDPs within the host communities.
The definition of IDPs used by enumerators for this assessment was ‘Individuals or groups of people who have been forced to leave their homes or places of habitual residence, in particular as a result of or in order to avoid the effects of armed conflict, situations of generalised violence, violations of human rights, or natural or man-made disasters, and who have not crossed an international border'. The definition of planned camp was 'A planned camp is a place where IPDs find accomodation on purpose-built sites, where service infrastructure is provided and distribution take place. The camp is established by an accountable humanitarian actor and to the extent possible, meet the minimum SPHERE standards'. The definition of informal settlements was 'Otherwise known as a self-settled camp or a spontaneous site, hosting 5 or more IDP households. IDPs may settle in a camp that is independent of assistance from the government or humanitarian community. They are a group of tented, or other types of housing units, or unfinished buildings established by IDPs themselves or by non-experienced actors, often erected on land that the occupants have no legal claim to. IDPs intend to stay in this location for an extended period of time. At the moment, most of the so-called IDP camps in Syria fall under this category. ' The definition of collective centres was 'A pre-existing building or other structure used to host 5 or more IDP households, e.g. public buildings, schools, mosques, private collective building' The definition of transit reception centres was 'Otherwise known as transit camps, they provide temporary accomodation for displaced persons pending transfer to a suitable, safe, longer term camp, or at the end of an operation as a staging point of return. Reception/transit centres are usually either intermediate or short-term installations. These sites are often established during extremely large displacements.'
Information should be considered as reflective of the situation at the time of data collection, given the dynamic situation in the region. In addition, information should be considered as indicative, and not representative, of the situation.
Updated
November 29, 2019
| Dataset date: May 1, 2016-Nov 22, 2019
This dataset updates: Every six months
The assessment contains IDPs and Returnees data at village level. The data is gender and age disaggregated and also has number of vulnerable population and the needs assessment.
Updated
November 28, 2019
| Dataset date: Sep 1, 2019
This data is by request only
MCNA conducted at household level nationwide in Iraq. The MCNA covered all conflict-affected populations: in-camp IDP, out-of-camp IDP, returnee and select host populations, in all accessible districts where target population were present. Sampled on district (ADM 2) level and data collected June - August 2019.
Updated
November 28, 2019
| Dataset date: Sep 1, 2019
This dataset updates: Every year
MCNA conducted at household level nationwide in Iraq. The MCNA covered all conflict-affected populations: in-camp IDP, out-of-camp IDP, returnee and select host populations, in all accessible districts where target population were present. Sampled on district (ADM 2) level and data collected June - August 2019.
Updated
November 18, 2019
| Dataset date: Aug 8, 2019-Oct 10, 2019
This dataset updates: Every three months
NPM Bangladesh has produced a number of tools based on its regular data collection activities. The package of November 2019 is based on NPM Site Assessment 16 (during the months of 21st August – 10th October) and NPM most updated drone imagery (as of 23 January 2019).
Here below, the complete package by camp:
SW Map package KMZ file Drone image
The full image and shapefiles are available at this link.
Updated
November 10, 2019
| Dataset date: Jun 11, 2018
This dataset updates: Every three months
Rapid needs assessment conducted across 255 communities in Idleb Governorate and surrounding opposition held areas in north western Hama, and western Aleppo. Dataset includes demographics, IDP movement intentions, and sectoral information for shelter, food security, livelihoods, electricity and NFIs, WASH, Health, Education, and Protection. Data was collected from May 24th to the 31st.
Updated
November 10, 2019
| Dataset date: Aug 1, 2018-Sep 26, 2018
This dataset updates: Every year
The overall objective of the Hard to Reach component of the Whole of Afghanistan Assessment was to supplement of the household data collection with an understanding of the multi-sectoral needs faced by those in Hard to Reach areas. This data ought to inform humanitarian programming in these districts and support the identification of nationwide inter-sectoral needs and how they inter-relate across different geographic locations and population groups outlined in the Humaniarian Needs Overview (HNO).
The Hard to Reach component of the Whole of Afghanistan (WoA) Assessment utilised Mapping Focus Group Discussions for the mapping process and Key Informant Interviews with knowledgeable community members to identify needs and access constraints. This data complemented the household-level data collection component of the Whole of Afghanistan. The presented dataset here includes the key informant responses across the 70 Hard to Reach districts, conducted to capture inter-sectoral needs of displaced and host households in these areas of Afghanistan.
Updated
November 10, 2019
| Dataset date: Feb 26, 2019
This dataset updates: As needed
Since the end of January 2019, southern Idleb and northern Hama governorates have seen a significant escalation of conflict. Shelling and airstrikes intensified in the area, leading to a deterioration of the humanitarian situation. In response, REACH conducted a rapid needs assessment to provide actors with an update on the humanitarian situation.
The latest conflict escalation affects an area that is home to an estimated 700,000 residents and internally displaced persons (IDPs), increasing vulnerability, and in some cases, leading to secondary and tertiary displacements. From late 2017, the region has witnessed a large-scale influx of IDPs, following escalations of conflict and displacements from formerly opposition-held areas in south-east Idleb, south-west Aleppo, Rural Damascus, Homs, Hama, Dar’a and Quneitra governorates. The increase in IDP population in Idleb governorate and surrounding areas has led to a growing strain on resources and an increase in inter-communal tensions in the region. Further complicating the situation, there has been increasing concern regarding a potential military offensive in the region since September 2018, with shelling and airstrikes occurring with increased frequency. While the mid-September 2018 announcement of a demilitarised zone put a pause on concerns over an imminent military offensive in the region, clashes have continued unabated.
Data for this assessment was collected from 25-26 February 2019 in 85 opposition-controlled communities in 12 sub-districts via community-level key informant (KI) interviews. KIs were asked to report on the previous week (18 to 25 February). This dataset provides the findings for indicators on demographics, shelter, food, livelihoods, electricity & NFIs, WASH, health, education, protection, reported priority needs, and reported movement intentions.
Updated
November 10, 2019
| Dataset date: Jun 30, 2016
This dataset updates: Never
In June 2016, a third round of the MSNA updates was initiated by REACH, supported by ECHO, following the February 2016 update to the MSNA baseline. This assessment draws on community level data, collected from “People with Knowledge” (PwK). Findings indicate that the situation of some population groups remains challenging, with prevalent threats to personal safety and security reported in certain locations in addition to unaffordable basic needs, weakened WASH infrastructure, and restricted access to livelihoods and liquidity in some areas.
