Updated
June 30, 2020
| Dataset date: Jan 1, 2019-Apr 30, 2020
This dataset updates: As needed
This dataset includes incidents affecting the affecting the protection of IDPs and refugees. The data contains incidents identified in open sources. Categorized by country and with links to relevant Monthly News Brief.
The Syrian IDP camps monitoring interactive study is issued by the IMU of the ACU on a monthly basis, to monitor the humanitarian situation of 231 IDp camps in Idleb and Aleppo governorates in Syria’s northwest, shedding light on the needs of the IDPs and the services provided in the camps in the following sectors:
Population statistics, WASH, Health, Education, FSL, Shelter and NFI, in addition to the priority needs of IDPs. The study also includes statistics of those who arrive at and leave the camps and the important incidents which took place during the month of the data collection.
Updated
June 12, 2020
| Dataset date: Mar 1, 2020-Apr 30, 2020
This dataset updates: Every three months
This datasets has IDPs, Household & Returnees data at Admin3 level gathered through DTM Mobility Tracking Assessment.
In the context of the political instability that has prevailed since the uprising in Libya (October 2011) and culminated in the collapse of a fragile central authority accompanied by fragmentation and infighting among myriads of militias, with continued fighting since the mid-2014 escalations, estimates indicate that the number of Internally Displaced Per-sons (IDPs) in Libya has exceeded 400,000 individuals, some eight percent of the total population (HNO, September 2015). While the country struggles to achieve and maintain stability, thousands of migrants are also taking journeys to and through Libya in a desperate bid to seek a better life in Europe. These migrants are exposed to risks of being trafficked and exploited while traveling through dangerous routes in deserts and territories controlled by different armed groups, as well as dying during attempts to cross the Mediterranean Sea.
However, there has been no standardized mechanism in place to verify and regularly update IDP and migrant numbers. Given that most humanitarian and international organizations operate remotely from Tunis since mid-July 2014 due to the deteriorating security situation, maintaining access to reliable and updated data on the humanitarian situation in Libya has been challenging.
Updated
January 6, 2020
| Dataset date: Dec 25, 2019-Dec 27, 2019
This dataset updates: As needed
Findings presented in this data set are based on data collected by REACH as part of a rapid camps and sites assessment to provide insight on:
How many new IDP arrivals are arriving to camps, informal settlements, collective centres, or transit reception centres reported at the site level since Dec. 18th
Movement intentions of the new IDP arrivals in the coming two weeks
Identify priority needed items by sector of the new IDP arrivals. Data was collected in 150 communities across eight sub-districts in Northern Idleb and Western Aleppo from 25 to 27 December 2019 through REACH enumerators who surveyed one Key Informant (KI) per community on internally displaced persons' (IDPs) camps and sites nearest to their community.
In order to qualify as camp or site, a site had to have 5 or more IDP households living on its premises. 1,253 camps and sites were assessed across 150 communities. IDP numbers solely represent newly arrived IDPs (5 or more HH) to planned camps, informal settlements, collective centres, and transit reception centres, and do not account for total camp or site IDP populations or IDPs within the host communities.
The definition of IDPs used by enumerators for this assessment was ‘Individuals or groups of people who have been forced to leave their homes or places of habitual residence, in particular as a result of or in order to avoid the effects of armed conflict, situations of generalised violence, violations of human rights, or natural or man-made disasters, and who have not crossed an international border'. The definition of planned camp was 'A planned camp is a place where IPDs find accomodation on purpose-built sites, where service infrastructure is provided and distribution take place. The camp is established by an accountable humanitarian actor and to the extent possible, meet the minimum SPHERE standards'. The definition of informal settlements was 'Otherwise known as a self-settled camp or a spontaneous site, hosting 5 or more IDP households. IDPs may settle in a camp that is independent of assistance from the government or humanitarian community. They are a group of tented, or other types of housing units, or unfinished buildings established by IDPs themselves or by non-experienced actors, often erected on land that the occupants have no legal claim to. IDPs intend to stay in this location for an extended period of time. At the moment, most of the so-called IDP camps in Syria fall under this category. ' The definition of collective centres was 'A pre-existing building or other structure used to host 5 or more IDP households, e.g. public buildings, schools, mosques, private collective building' The definition of transit reception centres was 'Otherwise known as transit camps, they provide temporary accomodation for displaced persons pending transfer to a suitable, safe, longer term camp, or at the end of an operation as a staging point of return. Reception/transit centres are usually either intermediate or short-term installations. These sites are often established during extremely large displacements.'
Information should be considered as reflective of the situation at the time of data collection, given the dynamic situation in the region. In addition, information should be considered as indicative, and not representative, of the situation.
Updated
November 10, 2019
| Dataset date: Apr 4, 2018
This dataset updates: Every three months
This dataset comprises of 644 facilities that were classified as not exposed to a flood or landslide hazard within the 21 Kutupalong Refugee Camps to assess which facilities would be optimal for further shelter upgrades and reinforcement. An index was created for prioritization and of these 644 sites, 224 were identified as having optimal indicators for further site visits. Corresponding maps for these 224 sites can be found on the REACH Resource Centre or ReliefWeb. It should be noted that ALL 644 facilities not exposed to a flood or landslide hazard should be explored as viable options for awareness raising to the local Camp/Majhee populations. For further information regarding the indicators used for the analysis please see the caveats section below.
Updated
November 10, 2019
| Dataset date: Apr 15, 2018
This dataset updates: Every three months
This dataset includes facility exposure to flood and landslide hazards for camps south of Kutupalong (Camps 14, 15, 16, Chakmarkul, Jadimura, Unchiprang, Leda, & Neyapara). Data is from REACH's Round 4 infrastructure mapping . For further information regarding flood and landslide methodology please refer to the metadata caveats section. For access to media hyperlink files please contact reach.mapping@impact-initiatives.org or the ISCG in CXB.
Updated
November 10, 2019
| Dataset date: Aug 17, 2016-Sep 19, 2016
This dataset updates: Every three months
This dataset provides the clean data from round VI of the Quarterly IDP Camp Profiling exercise in Iraq, conducted in August-September 2016. The exercise was conducted by REACH and the CCCM Cluster Iraq. Findings are based on a total of 4,097 household interviews, and provide statistically representative data about the humanitarian situation and needs of the population of 48 formal IDP camps across Iraq.
Updated
November 10, 2019
| Dataset date: Dec 30, 2014-Jan 18, 2015
This dataset updates: Every six months
This population count of Za'atari Refugee Camp, Jordan, provides information about the camp's current inhabitants, disaggregated by age, sex, block and district, date of arrival, area of origin and shelter type. The count was conducted by REACH in partnership with UNICEF, between December 2014 to January 2015, in order to provide up to date figures about the camp's inhabitants to influence the planning and delivery of assistance by humanitarian actors.
The population count shows a total population of 78,086 Syrian refugees present in Za’atari. This is
7,954 less than the last population count of Za’atari camp, conducted in June 2014, which identified 86,040 people.
You can explore this dataset further using the Za'atari Camp Population Count Interactive Dashboard.
You can also download the [Summary of Key Findings from the Za'atari Camp Population Count, January 2015] (http://www.reachresourcecentre.info/system/files/resource-documents/reach_jor_report_zaatari_camp_population_count_february2015_1.pdf)
Updated
October 31, 2019
| Dataset date: Sep 30, 2019
This dataset updates: Every six months
The dataset contains households and individual number of returnees at village level. The dataset is gender and age dis-aggregated with category of returnees i.e. IDPs or Refugees.
Updated
May 2, 2019
| Dataset date: Mar 26, 2019-Apr 18, 2019
This dataset updates: Never
Data collected in Bangladesh between March-April, 2019. Their analysis contributed to the Xchange Foundation's “We do not believe Myanmar!”: The Rohingya Survey 2019 (http://xchange.org/reports/TheRohingyaSurvey2019.html)
Updated
April 4, 2019
| Dataset date: Jun 30, 2015
This dataset updates: Every two weeks
Data as of late June 2015. The "Syria IDP Sites" dataset is compiled by the U.S. Department of State, Humanitarian Information Unit (INR/GGI/HIU). This dataset contains open source derived data about the geographic locations (point geometry) of identified tent camps and other locations, such as collective centers, schools, mosques, sports facilities, host families, etc. in towns inside Syria where displacement has taken place. Sources of this information include the United Nations, the Assistance Coordination Unit, the Syria Needs Assessment Project, NGOs, and media reports. Location coordinates are at the city level and are plotted using the Syria P-Code system (http://www.mapaction.org/map-catalogue/mapdetail/2753.html) and NGA GEOnet Names Server (http://earth-info.nga.mil/gns/html) datasets. The field "PCode" is a combination of the all the administrative level and community level P-Codes for a specific location. Camp locations are verified using high-resolutions commercial satellite imagery. In the "Designation" field "IDP Site" refers to informal or formal settlements for specific IDP use. This dataset will be updated as needed and is current as of late June 2015.
This dataset is primarily hosted on the State GeoNode, the open geographic data platform of the U.S. Department of State.
IDP shapefile collected by MSF Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) International - doctors without borders during the first week of April 2019 in Mozambique Beire
Updated
February 6, 2019
| Dataset date: Jan 31, 2019
This dataset updates: As needed
On 26 December 2018, exceptionally heavy rainfall caused severe flash flooding in Idleb and Aleppo governorates in north-west Syria. This area has a high proportion of displaced people and concentration of camps and sites, making it a region with a notably large vulnerable population. Hundreds of tents were reportedly swept away and concrete houses in camps collapsed. As a result of the flooding, thousands of people have been impacted
Updated
December 28, 2018
| Dataset date: Oct 1, 2018
This dataset updates: As needed
The IMU of the ACU, issues its fourth edition of the “Winter Needs in the Northern Syrian Camps” report, addressing 234 camps in the governorates of Aleppo and Idleb. The report brings to light the most important items that IDPs are in need for in terms of type and quantities, according to international standards for humanitarian response. It furthermore, brings emphasis to bear on the course of action that IDPs, as well as the camp management teams, should follow to drive down the effects of natural disasters that may put their lives at risk. Noting that the number of families that ACU enumerators were able to assess their needs reached 46,145 families, making up an overall individual number of 252,052 IDPs
NPM Bangladesh has produced a number of tools based on its regular data collection activities and drone flights. The package of September - October 2018 is based on NPM Site Assessment 12 (as of 10 October) and NPM most updated drone imagery (as of 26 September).
Here below, the complete package by camp:
SW Map package
KMZ file
Drone image
The full image and shapefiles are available at this link.
